Arsenic Concentrations in Florida Surface Soils: Influence of Soil Type and Properties

نویسندگان

  • M. Chen
  • L. Q. Ma
چکیده

through the food chain via uptake from contaminated soils may adversely affect human health (Arnt et al., Background As concentrations in soils are important for defining 1997). While the regulations governing As contaminawhether a soil is polluted. Arsenic concentrations in 441 taxonomically tion in waters are well defined, the regulatory cleanup and geographically representative surface soils were determined using EPA Method 3052 (HCl-HNO3-HF digestion). Cumulative distribugoals for remediation of contaminated soils are still untion plots indicate that As concentrations follow a log-normal distribuder development and may vary greatly among countries, tion and depend on soil type. Sample geometric mean(GM) (the states, and land uses. For example, the regulatory limits exponential mean of the log-transformed distribution) As concentraset by the Ministry of Environment of Canada for As tions (mg kg 1 ) generally follow the soil taxonomic order of Histosols contamination in agricultural, industrial, and residential (2.35) Inceptisols (0.98), Mollisols (0.72) Ultisols (0.51) Alfisols soils are 25, 50, and 25 mg kg 1, respectively (Arnt et (0.39), and Entisols (0.36) Spodosols (0.18). The highest As concenal., 1997). In contrast, those for the United Kingdom trations were found in soils that occur exclusively or prevalently in are set at 10 mg kg 1 for domestic gardens and 40 mg wetlands, such as Hemists (3.16–9.44), Saprists (0.15–11.7), Aquents kg 1 for parks, playing fields, and open spaces (O’Neill, (0.10–50.6), Aquolls (0.03–3.34), and Aquepts (0.03–38.2). Both linear 1990). Variations of this type are also found in the U.S. and multiple regressions indicate soil properties (clay, pH, cationregulatory guidelines (Association for Environmental exchange capacity [CEC], organic C, and total Al), especially total Health of Soils, 1998). The New Jersey Department Fe and P, are important factors affecting natural background concenof Environmental Protection (NJDEP) has set a state trations of As in Florida soils. Arsenic release from bedrock (limecleanup criterion of 20 mg kg 1 for both residential and stone) and As bioaccumulation by aquatic organisms are possible nonresidential soils based on background soil As levels explanations for relatively high As in those wetland soils. The use of a single regulatory value criterion for As contamination in soil cannot (Barringer et al., 1998; NJDEP, 1998). The current soil provide an adequate assessment given the natural variation in soil cleanup goals set by the Florida Department of EnvironAs. Baseline soil-As concentration, which was defined as 95% of the mental Protection (FDEP) for As in residential and expected range of background As concentrations in different soil industrial soils are 0.80 and 3.7 mg kg 1, respectively categories, is necessary for properly assessing potential As contami(Tonner-Navarro et al., 1998), based on direct exposure. nation. Variations in these guidelines indicate a need for standardizing how cleanup criteria are established. In cases where the risk-based criteria are lower than the method P concerns over As pollution in both soils detection limit (NJDEP, 1998) or are below the siteand waters have substantially increased in recent specific background level, it is reasonable to use the years (Association for the Environmental Health of latter two as the cleanup criteria (Association for EnviSoils, 1998; Research Triangle Institute, 1998). Long ronmental Health of Soils, 1998). Therefore, it is imporsuspected to be responsible for bladder, kidney, liver, tant to obtain accurate As background concentrations lung, and skin cancers, inorganic As has been listed by for different soils to prevent unrealistically low mandatory guideline levels (Kabata-Pendias and Pendias, the USEPA as a Class A human carcinogen (Research 1992; Davies, 1992). To obtain the accuracy required Triangle Institute, 1998). The current maximum allowfor regulation purpose, As background levels in soils able levels of As for oral intake and drinking water should be based on a sufficiently large database. These are set at 0.3 g kg 1 d 1 and 50 g L 1, respectively data can then be used as a reference to compare with (USEPA, 1998). However, the World Health Organizasite-specific As concentrations (Breckenridge and Crocktion has recently begun to press for stricter consumption ett, 1995) in determining whether or not a particular standards and has recommended lowering the As drinksoil type is contaminated. ing water standard to 10 g L 1 (Research Triangle The main source of As in soils is the parent materials Institute, 1998). The USEPA is currently under pressure from which the soil is derived. Atmospheric deposition from the National Research Council to lower its current contributes significantly to the geochemical cycle of As drinking water standard of 50 g As L 1 to 20 g As (Smith et al., 1998). Also, bioconcentration of As by L 1 to adequately protect public health (Christen, 1999). lowland plants and aquatic organisms, such as algae, In addition to concerns over As contamination in seagrass (Halophila Thouars), and lower invertebrates water sources, it is also known that dietary intake of As (Otte et al., 1990; Cullen and Reimer, 1989; Strom et al., 1992) contributes to elevate As concentrations in M. Chen*, Institute of Geography and Natural Resources, Chinese lowland soils. Doyle and Otte (1997) found that salt Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China. L.Q. Ma, and W.G. marshes could act as effective sinks for As and other Harris, Soil and Water Science Dep., University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0290. Approved for publication as Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series No. R-07010. Received 15 Sept. Abbreviations: CEC, cation-exchange capacity; ENP, Everglades Na2000. *Corresponding author ([email protected]) and current tional Park; FDEP, Florida Department of Environmental Protection; address: Everglades Education and Research Center, University of GM, geometric mean; GSD, geometric standard deviation; NJDEP, Florida, 3200 E. Palm Beach Road, Belle Glade, FL 33430. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection; UBC, upper baseline concentration. Published in Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66:632–640 (2002).

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Arsenic distribution in Florida urban soils: comparison between Gainesville and Miami.

Arsenic contamination is of concern due to its effect as a carcinogen. Understanding the distribution of arsenic in urban soils is important for establishing baseline concentrations from which anthropogenic effects can be measured. The soil cleanup target level (SCTL) for arsenic in Florida (0.8 and 3.7 mg kg(-1) in residential and commercial areas, respectively) is lower than in most states an...

متن کامل

Distribution and Variation of Arsenic in Wisconsin Surface Soils, With Data on Other Trace Elements

A total of 664 soil samples distributed among different geographic regions and soil types were collected across Wisconsin to describe the distribution of arsenic relative to parent material, soil texture, and drainage class. Soils from 6 inches in depth were composited, digested in aqua regia, and analyzed for 17 trace elements. Observed soil arsenic concentrations range from a high of 39 milli...

متن کامل

Assessment of pollution level, non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risk of heavy metals on human health in surface soils of Arak industrial areas, Iran

Background and Objective: Heavy metal contamination of surface soils has become a serious concern. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential risk of heavy metal (loid) pollution on human health in the surface soils of Arak industrial areas, the capital of Markazi province in western Iran. Materials and Methods: 235 surface soil samples were collected from a depth of 0-5 cm. Concentra...

متن کامل

Influence of soil properties on the bioaccumulation and effects of arsenic in the earthworm Eisenia andrei

This study aimed at assessing the influence of soil properties on the uptake and toxicity effects of arsenic in the earthworm Eisenia andrei exposed for 4 weeks to seven natural soils spiked with different arsenic concentrations. Water-soluble soil concentrations (AsW) and internal As concentrations in the earthworms (AsE) were greatly different between soils. These two variables were highly co...

متن کامل

Comparison between background concentrations of arsenic in urban and non-urban areas of Florida

Arsenic contamination is of great environmental concern due to its toxic effects as a carcinogen. Knowledge of arsenic background concentrations is important for land application of wastes and for making remediation decisions. The soil clean-up target level for arsenic in Florida (0.8 and 3.7 mg kg for residential and commercial areas, y1 respectively) lies within the range of both background a...

متن کامل

تأثیر جاذب‌های معدنی بر تحرک آرسنیک و فسفر در یک خاک آلوده به آرسنیک

In this work, the effect of raw and modified bentonite and zeolite with trivalent iron on the stabilization of water-soluble and adsorbed arsenic in a calcareous soil was studied. Raw and modified bentonite and zeolite were added to the soil in different weights in a completely randomized block design with three replications and kept to field capacity soil moisture content of 80% for 8 weeks. T...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2002